Home  |  NRA Documents  |  Road Costs  |  News  |  Guestbook  |  Links  

 


Minutes of meeting with Argus held April 11th, 2002.
Present:: Argus: Con Traas, Cyril Burke, Jenny Kiely, John Bradley, Lynn Bradley
Apologies: Tom Shine

South Tipp. Co. Co.: Michael O’ Malley
Halcrow Barry: Bob Diffen

__________________________________

We agreed not to audio-record the meeting as this was against normal council
practice.

1. Michael O’Malley confirmed that the N24 project is covered by the IFA agreement, and that the extra €5000 per acre goodwill payment etc. etc. apply.
2. In response to the question of what roadways were considered, it was explained by Bob Diffen that the initial brief was to identify a route for a wide 2-lane road. When the traffic figures were examined, these indicated that a dual carriageway was required. Various route options were considered as dual carriageway and the green route selected as the preferred route.
3. When we asked whether the Woodroffe traffic counter figures were accurate, we were informed that they probably were, although there is a chance that it is under-counting. This would need to be confirmed. We were also informed of the “new” location of this traffic counter which is now located near the entrance to the metal re-cycling depot.
4. An undertaking was given to supply our group with the traffic assignment figures.
5. We will also be able to purchase the constraints study.
6. The route selection report is not available to us yet, as it has not been formally submitted to the NRA. Some of the information in it will be made available to us, and Michael O’Malley will get back to us on this matter.
7. The Halcrow Barry figures indicate a dual carriageway, but the figures are just over the threshold. Bob Diffen expects to be asked to consider another road type in addition to dual carriageway (probably some sort of divided roadway with alternating twin lanes)
8. The growth factors as published in the National Roads Needs study are those currently being used.
9. The design year for which the road is being specified is 2026 (20 years after expected completion).
10. In Bob Diffen’s opinion, wide 2 -lane roadways can have high accident rates as traffic flows increase and in his view become undesireable. To build stretches of more than 2km of this type of roadway now requires the
express permission of the NRA.


 

 11. When we asked where in priority terms was the N24 dual carriageway, Michael O’Malley explained that the priority in South Tipperary is to be the N8 motorway. He further explained that when the N8 is underway or nearing completion that the N24 will be tackled. He also outlined that if more money was made available, that then the N24 might proceed more quickly. Michael O’Malley estimated that the N8 would start in 2004 and be completed in 2007, and that the N24 would start then. However, this was only a guess
on his part.
12. With regard to the existing N24, we expressed concern that little would be done to it between now and 2010 (when the N24 would be finished). Michael O’Malley outlined that the council were considering widening in certain
parts (without removing any hedges or encroaching on land) to facilitate traffic to overtake agricultural vehicles etc.
13. Bob Diffen said that the main reason why a re-alignment option will not work is due to traffic conflicts (too many junctions, house entrances etc.)
14. With regard to the costs of roadway, Bob Diffen said that the current per km cost of roads is €7.25m for motorway type dual carriageways. The current cost estimate of the Rathkeevin to Cahir dual carriageway is€47m,
i.e. €4.7m per km (inc. Vat)
15. Bob Diffen agreed that the more expensive the road the greater the fee paid to Halcrow Barry. However, he outlined that this would not lead to a conflict of interest as Halcrow Barry must comply with design standards; decisions are subject to audit; and economic justification is required.
16. We stated that more people are opposed to a dual carriageway on the green route than were opposed to the pink re-alignment option.
17. We were told that the Cahir Eastern Relief Road is now almost certainly not to go ahead.
18. We outlined that many householders were unhappy at how they had been treated at the preferred route exhibition, although Bob Diffen himself had been helpful to people. Both Michael O’Malley and Bob Diffen stated that
this was contrary to the feedback they had received. Bob Diffen explained that the term “directly affected” applied only to those who will have land taken from them, and so people to whom the roadway will pass closely, may
have been told that they were not “directly affected”

While not exhaustive or complete, the above 18 points are an accurate reflection of much of the discussion at the meeting:

Signed: (For Argus roads group)


Signed: (For South Tipperary County Council)