Home  |  NRA Documents  |  Road Costs  |  News  |  Guestbook  |  Links 

Why are we against the proposed route?

 
There is no point in having two roads between Rathkeevin and Cahir. The existing roadway (though in need of major up-grading) has a current capacity of about 5000 vehicles per day (our estimate) although current usage is 7800 vehicles per day. If a new roadway is built through a Greenfield location, the combined capacity of the two will be 50,000 vehicles per day (if a dual carriageway goes ahead as planned) or 19,000 vehicles per day if the dual carriageway is scaled back to a wide two-lane roadway. 

Both of these options lead to gross over-capacity and this is inherently wasteful.

There will be two roadways that require maintenance (hedge-trimming, repairs and re-surfacing, line painting etc.). There will still be remedial work to be carried out on the existing roadway because the dangerous corners will still be dangerous.
Although the consultants claim that it will be cheaper to build a new roadway, we believe that common sense and the published NRA figures indicate otherwise (see Costs page).

We therefore submit that there should only be a single roadway between Rathkeevin and Cahir, and that this should be a re-alignment of the current roadway. 

Interestingly, this is also the recommendation made in the National Roads Needs Study schedule of improvement needs (Annex 4) where a wide two-lane roadway is recommended for this route at an estimated cost of € 16.7 (1998 prices).

Furthermore, the NRA proceeded with this option to the point where land surveys were undertaken and detailed plans were drawn up.